Yeah, leaving out the United States is one of the biggest signs this map isn’t serious.
The U.S. is one of the most powerful countries in the world. It has huge influence over global politics, the economy, and even military decisions. Taking it out of the map is like removing a main character and acting like the story still works.
If you’re talking about world peace, you have to deal with the U.S. and its relationships with countries like China and Russia, plus its involvement in places like the Middle East. Ignoring all that just skips the hard part.
So instead of solving anything, the image just removes one of the biggest global players and pretends that makes things peaceful. It doesn’t. It just makes the idea unrealisticc
Farouque
2 Comments
Yeah, leaving out the United States is one of the biggest signs this map isn’t serious.
The U.S. is one of the most powerful countries in the world. It has huge influence over global politics, the economy, and even military decisions. Taking it out of the map is like removing a main character and acting like the story still works.
If you’re talking about world peace, you have to deal with the U.S. and its relationships with countries like China and Russia, plus its involvement in places like the Middle East. Ignoring all that just skips the hard part.
So instead of solving anything, the image just removes one of the biggest global players and pretends that makes things peaceful. It doesn’t. It just makes the idea unrealisticc
You’re missing the point. It’s not meant to be a real plan, it’s just a simplified idea about how borders affect conflict.
Even if you add back countries like the United States or China, the concept still holds. Not everything has to be 100% realistic to make a point.
You think tyrants would not come up again?
They will, but atleast, the trouble makers will be put away